KEUTUHAN SURAH DALAM STRUKTUR AL-QUR'AN
Teori Nazm dalam Tafsir Nizam Al-Qur’an wa Ta'wil al-Furqan bi al-Furqan Karya al-Farahi
Abstract
In his book Nizam Al-Qur'an wa Ta’wil Al-Furqan bi Al-Furqan, al-Farahi (1863-1930), an Indian scholar, based his ideas on the wholeness of the surah in the structure of the Qur’an based on a number of assumptions: the coherent relationship between one verse and the next verses as well as the inter-connection relationship between one narrative and another in one surah into the wholeness (za wahdaniyyah). This article tries to analyze al-Farahi’s method of interpretation in the form of munasabah al-ayat, nazm, ‘amud and to evaluate his method. The author concludes that al-Farahi’s basic assumption is that the sura is a wholeness. The analytical method is a linguistic approach that includes mufradat (lexicology analysis), nahw (syntax), uslub (stylistics), mawaqi’ at-tadabbur (the place of reflection) and nazm (structure). Al-Farahi made al-Qur’an the primary source, because it interprets one another. Sources of interpretation outside of the Qur’an (hadith, asar and divine books) are secondary sources of interpretation which are positioned below the Qur’an. Al-Farahi concluded that the surah has one mandate, which he later called it as ‘amud.
Keywords: Al-Farahi, munasabah, nazm, ‘amud, coherence.
Downloads
References
Amin, Husnul. 2010. ‘From Islamism To Post-Islamism A Study of a New Intellectual Discourse on Islam and Modernity in Pakistan’. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
el-Awa, Salwa M.S. 2006. Tekstual Relation in the Quran: Relevance, Coherence and Structure. New York: Rouledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Al-Awani, Zainab. 2018. ‘Al-Wahda al-Bina’iyya Li-l-Qur’an: A Methodology for Understanding the Qur’an in the Modern Day’. The Journal of Islamic Faith and Practice 1 (1).
Ayyub, Ajal. 2002. ‘Tarjamat al-Muallif’. In Mufradat al-Quran. Sarai Mir: Dairah al-hamidiyyah.
Bint Syati’, Aisyah Abdurrahman. 1991. I’jaz al-Bayan. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif.
Biqa’i, Ibrahim al-. 1984. Nazm Al-Durar Fi Tanasub al-Ayati Wa al-Suwar. Cairo: Dar al-kitab al-Islami.
Al-Farahi, 'Abd al-Hamid. 1991a. Asalib Al-Qur’an. Sarai Mir: Dairah al-Hamidiyyah.
Al-Farahi, 'Abd al-Hamid. 1991b. Dala’il al-Nizam,. Sarai Mir: Dairah al-Humaidiyyah.
Al-Farahi, 'Abd al-Hamid. 1991c. Fatihah al-Nizam. Sarai Mir: Dairah al-hamidiyyah.
Al-Farahi, 'Abd al-Hamid. 1991d. Mufradat al-Qur’an. Sarai Mir: Dairah al-Hamidiyyah.
Al-Farahi, 'Abd al-Hamid. 2008a. Nizam Al-Qur’an WaTa’wil al-Furqan Bi al-Furqan. Sarai Mir: Dairah al-Hamidiyyah.
Al-Farahi, 'Abd al-Hamid. 2008b. tafsir surat al-Qiyamah. Sarai Mir: Dairah al-Hamidiyyah.
Al-Farahi, 'Abd al-Hamid. 2009. Hujaj al-Qur’an: al-Hikmah al-Bazghah wa al-Hujjah al-Balighah. Sarai Mir: Dairah al-Hamidiyyah.
Al-Farahi, 'Abd al-Hamid. 2011. Al-Takmil fi U?ul al-Ta’wil. Sarai Mir: Dairah al-hamidiyyah.
Farrin, Raymond. 2014. Structure and Quranic Interpretation: A Study of Symmetri and Coherence in Islam Holy Text. Ashland: White Cloud.
Fikry, Arif Rijalul. 2013. ‘Qasam Menurut Hamid Al-Din Al-Farahi (Studi Atas Kitab Im’an Fi Aqsam AlQur’an)’. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Al-Gazali, Muhammad. 1992. Nahw Tafsir Mau?u’i li Suwar al-Qur’an al-Karim. Kairo: Dar al-Syuruq.
Ghazi, Muhiuddin, Mohammed Farid Ali, Zulqernain Haider, dan Fathiyyatunnur Idris. 2018. ‘Imam Farahi’s View on Rationality: A Framework for Modernity Discourse’. Journal of Qur’an and Sunnah Studies 3 (1).
Halim, Abdul. 2013. ‘Konsep Nazm Hamiduddin Al-Farahi dan Implikasinya Terhadap Penafsiran Al-Qur’an’. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Heriyanto. 2017. ‘Asbab An-Nuzul Dalam Wacana Teologi Asy’ariyyah Relasi Pemikiran al-Gazali Dan Konsep Asbab an-Nuzul’. Suhuf 10 (1).
Jalil, Abdul. 2014. ‘‘Abd Al-Hamid Al-Farahi Dan Sumber-Sumber Sekunder Dalam Tafsir Berbasis Surat’. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 15 (2).
Losee, John. 2001. A Historical Introduction To The Philosophy Of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mandailing, Taufik. 2013. Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Muslim Nasionalis India. Yogyakarta: Goen’s Media.
Mir, Mustansir. 1986. Coherence Tadabbur-i al-Qur’an. Indianapolis: American Trust Publication.
Mir, Mustansir. 2013. ‘Continuity, Context, and Coherence in the Qur’an : A Brief Review of the Idea of Nazm in Tafsir Literature’. Al-Bayan: Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.11136/jqh.1311.02.02.
Mujab, Muhammad. 2001. ‘Islamic Sciences in India and Indonesia: A Comparative Study’. Aligarh: Aligarh Muslim University.
Neuwirth, Angelika. 2000. ‘Referentiality and Textuality in Surat Al-Hijr’. In Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qu’ran. Richmond: Curzon Press.
Qudsia, Miatul. 2019. ‘Konseptualisasi Dan Implementasi ‘Amud Pada Penafsiran Hamid Al-Din Al-Farahi’. Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel.
Rauf, Abdul. 2009. ‘Life and Works of Mawlana Amin Ahsan Islahi (1904-1997)’. Pakistan Journal of History and Culture XXX (1).
Rauf, Abdul. 2017. ‘Jihadist Ideology in Pakistan and Javed Ahmad Ghamidi’s Counter Narrative’. Journal of Social Sciences 11 (1).
Solahuddin, Ahmad. 2016. ‘Kritik Teori Nazm Hamiduddin al-Farahi’. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Al-Suyu?i, Jalaluddin. 2010. Al-Itqan. Vol. jilid 3. Saudi Arabia: Wizarah al-Syu’un al-Islamiah wa al-Auqaf wa al-Da’wah wa al-Irsyad.
Syamsuddin, Sahiron. 2019. ‘Pendekatan Dan Analisis Dalam Penelitian Teks Tafsir Sebuah Overview’. Suhuf 12 (1).
El-Tahry, Nevin Reda. 2010. Textual Integrity and Coherence in the Quran: Repetition and Narrative Structure in Surat al-Baqara. Toronto: Departemen of Near and Middle Eastern Civilization.
Wulandari, Selvia. 2016. ‘Kesatuan Tematik Surat Al-Rahman (Analisis Struktural (Nazm) Perspektif Al-Farahi)’. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Yunus, Mahmud. 1973. Kamus Arab-Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Mahmud Yunus Wadzuriyyah.
Zahniser, Mathias. 1991. ‘The Word of God and the Apostleship of Isa: a NarrativeAnalysis of Al Imran (3) : 33-62’. Jurnal of Semitic Studies 36.
Al-Zarkasyi, Muhammad. 2010. al-Burhan fi Ulum al-Qur’an,. Kairo: Maktabah Dar al-Turas.
© Copyright CC BY-SA
