PENDEKATAN DAN ANALISIS DALAM PENELITIAN TEKS TAFSIR:
Sebuah Overview
Abstract
Observing the many of methodological problems in conducting research on the works of the Qur'an and its interpretations, the author of this article explains certain approaches and analyzes that have been used by some prominent researchers in this area. The author describes the possible approach which is divided into two main parts: (1) critical approach of history, and (2) an interpretative approach. The main objective of the first approach is to evaluate, to whom the text of a particular interpretation must be addressed to, and how to some extent the certain statements in the interpretation can be considered correct. The second approach can be done by doing three types of analysis: (1) descriptive analysis, (2) explanatory analysis, and (3) critical analysis. According to the author, the research in the field of Qur'an and its interpretation requires not only Islamic sciences, but also contemporary theories in the fields of sociology, literature, philosophy, hermeneutics, and feminism. The writer expects that researchers in the field of interpretation should take the opportunity to deepen these supporting sciences in order that the research will be more developed and varied.
Downloads
References
Abott, Nabia. 1967. Studies in Arabic Literary Papyri. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Abdel Haleem, M.A.S. 2018. “The Role of Context in Interpreting and Translating the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 20 (1): 47-66.
Bashir, Kamran. 2015. “Revisiting Modern Na?m Approaches to the Qur’an: I?la?i’s
Interpretation of Q. 107 and Q. 108 in his Tadabbur-i Qur?an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 17 (2): 47-74.
Bauer, Karen. 2012. “Spiritual Hierarchy and Gender Hierarchy in Fa?imid Isma‘ili Interpretations of the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 14 (2): 29-46.
Bint asy-Sya?i’, ‘A’isyah ‘Abd ar-Ra?man. 1971. Muqaddimah fi al-Manhaj. Maroko: Ma‘had al-Bu??? wa al-Dirasah al-‘Arabiyyah.
_______. 1972. Al-Syakh?iyyah al-Islamiyyah. Beirut: Jami‘at Bayrut al-‘Arabiyyah.
Boullata, Issa J. 1988. “The Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’an,” dalam to the History of the Interpretation of the Qur’an, A. Rippin, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Calder, Norman. 1993. “Tafsir from Tabari to Ibn Kathir.” Dalam G.R. Hawting dan Abdul Kader, A. Shareef (ed.). Approaches to the al-Quran. London dan New York: Routledge.
Deny, F.M. 1988. “Qur’an Recitation Training in Indonesia A Survey of Contexts and Handboks.” Dalam Approaches to the History of the Interpretation of the Qur’an, Andrew Rippin, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Eickelman, Dale F. 1993. “Islamic Liberalism Strikes Back.” Mesa Bulletin 27: 163-168.
al-Jabi, Sulaym. 1991. Mujarrad Tanjim. Damaskus: AKAD.
Jaffer, Tariq. 2014. “Fakhr al-Din al-Razi on the Soul (al-nafs) and Spirit (al-r??): An Investigation into the Eclectic Ideas of Mafati? al-Ghayb.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 16 (1): 93.
Keblawi, Faris. 2014. “‘Ilm Hif? al-Qur’an: Fat? Bab al-Ba??.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 16 (2): 168-195.
Kenney, Edward John. “Textual Criticism.” Dalam www.britannica.com/topic/textual-citicism. Diakses pada tanggal 06 Mei 2018.
Lane, Andrew J. 2006. A Traditional Mu‘tazilite Qur’an Commentary: The Kashshaf of Jar Allah al-Zamakhshari (d. 538/1144). Leiden: Brill.
Martensson, Ulrika. 2009. “Through the Lens of Modern Hermeneutics: Authorial Intention in al-?abari’s and al-Ghazali’s Interpretation of Q. 24:35.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 11 (2): 20-48.
Mir, Mustansir. 1993. “The Sure as a Unity.” Dalam Approaches to the Qur’an. G.R. Hawting dan Abdul Kader A. Shareef, eds. London dan New York: Routledge.
Osborne, Grant S. 1991. The Hermeneutical Spiral. Illinois: Intervarsity Press.
Ouyang, Wen-Ching. 1997. Literary Criticism in Medieval Arabic-Islamic Culture the Making of Tradition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Marcotte, Roxanne D. 2008. “The Qur’an in Egypt I: Bint al-Sha?i’ on Women’s Emancipation.” Dalam Coming to Terms with the Qur’an, Khaleel Mohammed dan Andrew Rippin, eds. Noth Haledon: IPI, 2008.
Michael, Pregill. 2014. “Measure for Measure: Prophetic History, Qur’anic Exegesis, and Anti-Sunni Polemic in a Fa?imid Propaganda Work (BL Or. 8419).” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 16 (1): 20-57.
Robinson, Neal. 1996. Discovering the Qur’an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text. London: SCM Press Ltd.
Sinai, Nicolai. 2011. “An Interpretation of S?rat al-Najm (Q. 53). Journal of Qur’anic Studies 13 (2): 1-28.
Syamsuddin, Sahiron. 2014. “Peaceful Message beyond the Permission of Warfare (jihad): An Interpretation of Q. 21: 39-40.” Dalam (Un)common Sounds: Songs of Peace and Reconciliation among Muslims and Christians, Roberta R. King dan Sooi Ling Tan, eds. Oregon: CASCADE.
_______. 2017. “The Qur’an on the Exclusivist Religious Claim: A Ma‘na-cum Maghza Approach and its Application to Q 2: 111-113.” Dalam Transformative Readings of Sacred Scriptures: Christians and Muslims in Dialogue, Simone Sinn, Dina El Omari, dan Anne Hege Grung, eds. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlangsanstalt.
_______. 2017. Hermeneutika dan Pengembangan Ulumul Qur’an. Yogyakarta: Nawesea Press dan Baitul Hikmah Press.
Toyab, Abdul Kader. 1993.“An Analytical Survey of al-Tabari’s Exegesis of the Cultural Symbolic Construct of Fitna.” Dalam Approaches to the Qur’an. Hawting dan Shareef, eds. London dan New York: Routledge.
Van Laer, Henry. 1995. Filsafat Sain. Terj. Yudian W. Asmin dan Torang Rambe. Yogyakarta: LPMI.
Az-Zarkasyi, Mu?ammad ibn ‘Abd Allah. T.th. Al-Burhan fi ‘Ul?m al-Qur’an,
Mu?ammad Ab? al-Fadl Ibrahim, ed. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah
© Copyright CC BY-SA
